Nebulized fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for ED patients with acute limb pain: a randomized clinical trial.

Shervin Farahmand; Said Shiralizadeh; Mohammad-Taghi Talebian; Shahram Bagheri-Hariri; Mona Arbab; Hamed Basirghafouri; Morteza Saeedi; Mojtaba Sedaghat; Habibolla Mirzababai

首页> 外文期刊>The American journal of emergency medicine >Nebulized fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for ED patients with acute limb pain: a randomized clinical trial.

【24h】

Nebulized fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for ED patients with acute limb pain: a randomized clinical trial.

机译：芬太尼雾化静脉注射吗啡与静脉注射吗啡治疗急性肢体疼痛的ED患者：一项随机临床试验。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

This study suggests that nebulized fentanyl is a rapid, safe, and effective method for temporary control of acute limb pain in emergency department patients.

机译：这项研究表明雾化芬太尼是一种快速，安全，有效的方法，可用于临时控制急诊科患者的急性肢体疼痛。

著录项

来源
《The American journal of emergency medicine》 |2014年第9期|共5页
作者
Shervin Farahmand; Said Shiralizadeh; Mohammad-Taghi Talebian; Shahram Bagheri-Hariri; Mona Arbab; Hamed Basirghafouri; Morteza Saeedi; Mojtaba Sedaghat; Habibolla Mirzababai;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类治疗学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Nebulized fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for ED patients with acute limb pain: a randomized clinical trial. [J] . Shervin Farahmand, Said Shiralizadeh, Mohammad-Taghi Talebian, The American journal of emergency medicine . 2014,第9期

机译：芬太尼雾化静脉注射吗啡与静脉注射吗啡治疗急性肢体疼痛的ED患者：一项随机临床试验。
2. Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial. [J] . Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Chung F, JAMA: the Journal of the American Medical Association . 2004,第11期

机译：病人控制的盐酸芬太尼透皮vs静脉注射吗啡泵治疗术后疼痛：一项随机对照试验。
3. Comparison between intravenous morphine versus fentanyl in acute pain relief in drug abusers with acute limb traumatic injury [J] . Hojat Sheikh Motahar Vahedi, Hadi Hajebi, Elnaz Vahidi, 世界急诊医学杂志(英文版) . 2019,第001期

机译：静脉内吗啡与芬太尼在急性肢体外伤的药物滥用者中缓解疼痛的比较
4. Evaluation of Acute Pain Response to Intravenous Morphine in Japanese Patients with Cancer Pain Prior to Choice of Therapy [C] . K. Murakawa, K. Moriyama, H. Noma, International Pain Clinic . 2004

机译：评价治疗前癌症疼痛患者静脉内吗啡的急性疼痛反应
5. The effect of a fear -avoidance based intervention for patients with acute low back pain. A randomized clinical trial [D] . George, Steven Zachary 2002

机译：基于恐惧回避的干预对急性下腰痛患者的影响。一项随机临床试验
6. Comparison between intravenous morphine versus fentanyl in acute pain relief in drug abusers with acute limb traumatic injury [O] . Hojat Sheikh Motahar Vahedi, Hadi Hajebi, Elnaz Vahidi, 2019

机译：静脉内吗啡与芬太尼在急性肢体外伤的药物滥用者中缓解疼痛的比较
7. Nebulized versus intravenous morphine titration for the initial treatment of severe acute pain in the emergency department: study protocol for a multicenter, prospective randomized and controlled trial, CLIN-AEROMORPH [O] . Virginie Eve Lvovschi, Justine Joly, Nicolas Lemaire, 2019

机译：雾化与静脉内吗啡滴定，用于急诊部门严重急性疼痛的初始治疗：用于多中心，前瞻性随机和对照试验的研究方案，Clin-Aeromorph
8. Low-dose Ketamine Versus Morphine for Acute Pain In the ED: A Randomized Controlled Trial. [R] . Miller, J. P., Schauer, S. G., Ganem, V. J., 2015

机译：低剂量氯胺酮与吗啡用于急性疼痛的ED：随机对照试验。

Nebulized fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for ED patients with acute limb pain: a randomized clinical trial.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅