...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The quarterly journal of experimental psychology: QJEP >Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanismsunderlying the effects of posterror slowing
【24h】

Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanismsunderlying the effects of posterror slowing

机译：为什么发生错误后我们放慢速度？误差后影响放缓的潜在机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

People often become slower in their performance after committing an error, which is usually explainedby strategic control adjustments towards a more conservative response threshold. The present studytested an alternative hypothesis for explaining posterror slowing in terms of behavioural interferencesresulting from error monitoring by manipulating stimulus contrast and categorization difficulty in achoice reaction time task. The response– stimulus interval (RSI) was either short or long, using abetween-subject (Experiment 1) and a within-subject design (Experiment 2). Posterror slowingwas larger and posterror accuracy lower in short than in long RSI situations. Effects of stimulus con-trast disappeared in posterror trials when RSI was short. At long RSIs, stimulus contrast was additivewith posterror slowing. The results support the idea that at least two mechanisms contribute to poster-ior slowing: a capacity-limited error-monitoring process with the strongest influence at short RSIsand a criterion adjustment mechanism at longer RSIs.
机译：犯错误后，人们的表现通常会变慢，这通常可以通过对更保守的响应阈值进行战略控制调整来解释。本研究测试了另一种假设，用于通过在选择反应时间任务中操纵刺激对比和分类难度来解释错误监测导致的错误行为减慢。使用受试者之间（实验1）和受试者内部设计（实验2），反应-刺激间隔（RSI）可以短也可以长。与长期的RSI情况相比，短期内的误差后减慢更大，误差后的准确性降低。在RSI较短时，误差对比试验中刺激对比的影响消失了。在长RSI时，刺激对比会增加，并且误差后速度会减慢。结果支持这样的想法，即至少有两种机制有助于后期发布者放慢速度：在RSI较短时影响最大的容量受限错误监视过程，在RSI较长时采用标准调整机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号