European Court Judgment Changes the Rules for Dominant Companies-Bill Batchelor highlights the far-reaching implications of the AstraZeneca judgment.

BUI Batchelor

首页> 外文期刊>The regulatory affairs journal: Pharma >European Court Judgment Changes the Rules for Dominant Companies-Bill Batchelor highlights the far-reaching implications of the AstraZeneca judgment.

【24h】

European Court Judgment Changes the Rules for Dominant Companies-Bill Batchelor highlights the far-reaching implications of the AstraZeneca judgment.

机译：欧洲法院判决改变了主要公司的规则-Bill Batchelor强调了阿斯利康判决的深远影响。

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

On 1 July 2010, the European Union General Court handed down its judgment in the long-running saga of AstraZeneca's proton pump inhibitor anti-ulcer product, Losec (omeprazole). Although dealing with events that happened almost two decades ago, the case - barring appeal - is set to cast a long shadow over the activities of patent and regulatory professionals.

机译：2010年7月1日，欧盟总法院就长期存在的阿斯利康质子泵抑制剂抗溃疡药Losec（奥美拉唑）的传奇做出了判决。尽管处理了将近20年前发生的事件，但此案-禁止上诉-必将给专利和监管专业人员的活动蒙上阴影。

著录项

来源
《The regulatory affairs journal: Pharma》 |2010年第8期|共4页
作者
BUI Batchelor;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类药学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献

1. European Court Judgment Changes the Rules for Dominant Companies-Bill Batchelor highlights the far-reaching implications of the AstraZeneca judgment. [J] . BUI Batchelor The regulatory affairs journal: Pharma . 2010,第8期

机译：欧洲法院判决改变了主要公司的规则-Bill Batchelor强调了阿斯利康判决的深远影响。
2. Diagnosis of chronic gout: evaluating the american college of rheumatology proposal, European league against rheumatism recommendations, and clinical judgment. [J] . Pelaez Ballestas I, Hernandez Cuevas C, Burgos Vargas R, The Journal of rheumatology . 2010,第8期

机译：慢性痛风的诊断：评估美国风湿病学院的建议，反对风湿病的欧洲联盟的建议以及临床判断。
3. Coalition of utilities asks court to reconsider far-reaching transmission rule [J] . Hannah Northey Greenwire . 2014,第OCTa1期

机译：公用事业联盟要求法院重新考虑影响深远的输电规则
4. LATEST JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE - RELEVANCE FOR THE ONGOING DISCUSSION ON THE FUTURE REGULATION FOR PUBLIC SERVICE REQUIREMENTS? [C] . ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ GODIN European Conference on European Legislative Framework for Urban, Suburban and Regional Public Passenger Transport Services . 2006

机译：欧洲司法法院的最新判决 - 关于未来公共服务要求监管的相关性的相关性？
5. Rule by man, not the rule of law: The United States Supreme Court and regulatory takings judgments, 1905--2005. [D] . Biser, Jennis J. 2007

机译：人为统治而不是法治：美国最高法院和监管部门的判决，1905--2005年。
6. Post-traumatic stress disorder human rights and access to healthcare: an analysis of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights from an ethical perspective [O] . Marcin Orzechowski, Moritz E. Wigand, Marianne Nowak, 2021

机译：创伤后应力障碍人权和医疗保健：从道德视角下对欧洲人权法院的判断分析
7. Bridging the constitutional gap in EU executive rule-making: the court of justice approves legislative conferral of intervention powers to European securities markets authority: Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) judgment of 22 January 2014, case C-270/12, UK v. Parliament and Council (Grand Chamber) [O] . Marjosola Heikki 2015

机译：弥合欧盟行政法规制定中的宪法鸿沟：法院批准将干预权授予欧洲证券市场管理局的立法：欧盟法院（大庭）2014年1月22日判决，案例C-270 / 12 ，英国诉议会和议会（大会议厅）

European Court Judgment Changes the Rules for Dominant Companies-Bill Batchelor highlights the far-reaching implications of the AstraZeneca judgment.

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅