...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transport Reviews >Comments of the Responding Contributors
【24h】

Comments of the Responding Contributors

机译：响应者的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The eight responses to my paper have provided a wide-ranging commentary, broadly distinguished by theoretical argument and practical experiences in particular countries that have been exposed to institutional reforms in the role of markets and ownership in the delivery of public transport services. I have ordered the comments more or less according to the focus on theory and evidence. At the outset I am impressed with the general support for the thrust of my arguments and the need to monitor theory and practice continuously to ensure that we learn from past practices, and gain insights from theory that needs empirical confirmation. One message is clear: institutional settings differ between countries and cultures which can be quite constraining, but we can learn from each other and avoid many of the pitfalls that might be generic to good process and outcome. My response is an attempt to synthesize the positions of the eight respondents in the context of the key themes of my paper.
机译：对我的论文的八种回应提供了广泛的评论，特别是在那些经历了市场改革和所有权在公共交通服务提供中的制度改革的国家中，其理论论点和实践经验被广泛区分。根据对理论和证据的关注，我或多或少地命令了这些评论。一开始，我对我的论点的主要支持以及对不断进行理论和实践监测以确保我们从过去的实践中学习并从需要经验确认的理论中获得见识的需求印象深刻。一个信息很明确：国家和文化之间的机构设置不同，这可能会受到很大的限制，但是我们可以相互学习，避免许多可能会因良好的流程和结果而产生的陷阱。我的回答是尝试根据我论文的关键主题综合八个受访者的立场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号