...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Transport Reviews >Livelihoods, daily mobility and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa
【24h】

Livelihoods, daily mobility and poverty in sub-Saharan Africa

机译：撒哈拉以南非洲地区的生计，日常流动和贫困

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Based on research funded by the UK Department for International Development, this paper investigates the utility of a livelihoods approach in identifying the mobility and accessibility needs of the poor. Mobility patterns and livelihoods of stratified samples of households in urban-to-rural corridors originating in the national capital cities of Zimbabwe and Uganda are compared, with emphasis on the poor's position relative to higher income groups. It is found that livelihood work was the most frequent purpose of short-distance travel for all income groups and localities, amounting to 38% of trip purposes in Uganda and 46% in Zimbabwe. On average, Zimbabweans were more mobile making more daily trips over longer distances reflective of greater reliance on motorized transport in the country. Nonetheless, walking dominates modal journeys in both countries. Ugandans display heavier dependence on bicycle and motorcycle transport primarily through taxi hire compared with Zimbabweans' private care and public kombi bus transport. Survey evidence suggests that Uganda's poor and middle-incomed urban and rural residents benefit from more widely available multimodal public transport.
机译：在英国国际发展部资助的研究的基础上，本文研究了生计方法在确定穷人的流动性和无障碍需求方面的效用。比较了来自津巴布韦和乌干达等国家首都城市至农村走廊的家庭分层样本的流动方式和生计，重点是穷人相对于高收入人群的地位。调查发现，在所有收入群体和地区，民生工作都是短途旅行的最常见目的，占乌干达旅行目的的38％，津巴布韦占46％。平均而言，津巴布韦人的机动性更高，每天长途旅行次数更多，这反映出该国对机动化交通工具的依赖性越来越大。尽管如此，步行仍是两国交通方式中的主导。与津巴布韦人的私人护理和公共康普巴士运输相比，乌干达人主要通过出租车出租来表现出对自行车和摩托车运输的更大依赖。调查证据表明，乌干达的贫困和中收入城市和农村居民受益于更广泛的多式联运。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号