...
首页> 外文期刊>Health economics, policy, and law. >Is the pro-competition policy an effective solution for China's public hospital reform?
【24h】

Is the pro-competition policy an effective solution for China's public hospital reform?

机译:竞业限制政策是否是中国公立医院改革的有效解决方案?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The new round of health care reforms in China achieved significant initial results. New and emerging problems coinciding with the deepening of the reforms, however, require further institutional changes to strengthen the competition mechanism and promote public hospital efficiency. This paper provides a conceptual framework and preliminary assessment of public hospital competition in China. Specifically, we distinguish between two closely related concepts - competition and privatization, and identify several critical conditions under which hospital competition can be used as a policy instrument to improve health care delivery in China. We also investigate the current performance and identify several unintended consequences of public hospital competition - mainly, medical arms race, drug over-prescription and the erosion of a trusting relationship between patients and physicians. Finally, we discuss the policy options for enhancing the internal competition in China's hospital market, and conclude that public investment on information provision is key to reaping the positive outcomes of pro-competition policies.
机译:中国的新一轮医疗改革取得了重要的初步成果。但是,随着改革的深入,新出现的问题需要进一步的体制改革,以加强竞争机制并提高公立医院的效率。本文提供了中国公立医院竞争的概念框架和初步评估。具体而言,我们将竞争和私有化这两个密切相关的概念区分开来,并确定了在哪些关键条件下医院竞争可以用作改善中国医疗服务水平的政策工具。我们还将调查当前的表现,并确定公立医院竞争的一些意想不到的后果-主要是军备竞赛,药物过量处方以及患者与医生之间信任关系的削弱。最后,我们讨论了增强中国医院市场内部竞争的政策选择,并得出结论,信息提供方面的公共投资是获得竞争政策积极成果的关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号