• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Health communication >Check the Box that Best Describes You: Reflexively Managing Theory and Praxis in LGBTQ Health Communication Research
【24h】

Check the Box that Best Describes You: Reflexively Managing Theory and Praxis in LGBTQ Health Communication Research

机译：选中最能说明您问题的方框：LGBTQ健康传播研究中反思性地管理理论和实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The intersections between identity and health communication are complex and dynamic, yet few studies employ a critical-empirical research strategy to understand how these factors affect patient experiences. And although other disciplines have examined lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered, and queer (LGBTQ)-specific issues surrounding identity and health care, there is a gap in communication studies literature on the topic. The present study examines how LGBTQ patients experience the language and structure of medical intake forms by analyzing both existing forms and patient survey responses. Relying on a queer theory framework, we illustrate how intake forms can foreclose on LGBTQ identity with heteronormative assumptions about sexuality, gender, and relationships. We also offer recommendations for creating queer-friendly intake forms and avoiding heteronormativity in health communication research. Overall, we argue that researchers must use reflexive methodology in considering how identity categories can both limit and assist LGBTQ patients.
机译：身份与健康沟通之间的交集是复杂而动态的，但是很少有研究采用关键经验研究策略来了解这些因素如何影响患者体验。尽管其他学科已经研究了围绕身份和医疗保健的女同性恋，男同性恋，双性恋，变性和同志（LGBTQ）特定问题，但有关该主题的传播研究文献仍存在差距。本研究通过分析现有形式和患者调查回答来检验LGBTQ患者如何体验医疗摄入形式的语言和结构。依靠酷儿理论框架，我们说明了摄入形式如何通过关于性，性别和关系的异规范假设来阻止LGBTQ身份。我们还提供有关在健康交流研究中创建对酷儿友善的摄入形式并避免异方差的建议。总体而言，我们认为研究人员必须使用反思方法来考虑身份类别如何既可以限制又可以帮助LGBTQ患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号