• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Health sociology review: the journal of the Health Section of the Australian Sociological Association >Social capital and health: The problematic roles of social networks and social surveys
【24h】

Social capital and health: The problematic roles of social networks and social surveys

机译：社会资本与健康：社会网络和社会调查的问题性角色

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Social capital, social networks, social support and health have all been linked, both theoretically and empirically. However, the relationships between them are far from clear. Surveys of social capital and health often use measures of social networks and social support in order to measure social capital, and this is problematic for two reasons. First, theoretical assumptions about social networks and social support being part of social capital are contestable. Second, the measures used inadequately reflect the complexity and ambivalence of social relationships, often assuming that all social ties and contacts are of similarly value, are mutually reinforcing, and, in some studies, are based on neighbourhoods. All these assumptions should be questioned. Progress in our understanding requires more qualitative research and improved choice of indicators in surveys; social network analysis may be a useful source of methodological and empirical insight.
机译：社会资本，社会网络，社会支持与健康在理论上和经验上都已联系在一起。但是，它们之间的关系还很不清楚。对社会资本和健康状况的调查通常使用社会网络和社会支持的衡量指标来衡量社会资本，这是有问题的，有两个原因。首先，关于社会网络和社会支持是社会资本一部分的理论假设是有争议的。其次，所采用的措施不足以反映出社会关系的复杂性和矛盾性，通常假设所有社会纽带和人际关系具有相似的价值，相互促进，并且在某些研究中是基于邻里关系的。所有这些假设都应受到质疑。我们了解的进步要求进行更多的定性研究，并改进调查指标的选择;社交网络分析可能是方法论和实证见解的有用来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号