...
首页> 外文期刊>Hepatology: Official Journal of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases >Partial hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: confirming the trial that will never be, and some comments on the indications for liver resection.
【24h】

Partial hepatectomy versus radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: confirming the trial that will never be, and some comments on the indications for liver resection.

机译:肝癌部分肝切除术与射频消融术的比较:证实该试验永远不会进行,并就肝切除的适应症发表了一些评论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Does the study by Cho et al. give the final word on the equivalence between RFTA and resection? For the group of patients presenting with Child A cirrhosis and a very early HCC (some 5% of total referrals for HCC, at present), and probably for larger ones where RFTA can be optimally effective (HCC <3 cm), we believe so.
机译:Cho等人的研究吗?最终确定RFTA和切除术之间的等效性?对于患有儿童A肝硬化和非常早期的HCC(目前为HCC转诊的患者总数的5%)的患者组,以及对于RFTA可以达到最佳疗效(HCC <3 cm)的较大患者,我们相信。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号