首页> 外文期刊>Health & place >Domesticating biosurveillance: 'Containment' and the politics of bioinformation
【24h】

Domesticating biosurveillance: 'Containment' and the politics of bioinformation

机译:驯化生物监测:“遏制”与生物信息政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although the term biosurveillance is employed with increasing frequency there remain variances in way in which the concept is both understood and practiced in the US and the UK, respectively. In this paper I begin by exploring the different epistemological and geographical approaches to biosurveillance that are employed in each locality, paying particular attention to the scales at which they, respectively, operate. I also consider how the subjects of these systems (a State's citizenry) are monitored in each jurisdiction and with what effects. I contend in this paper, and illustrate through a study of the techniques of surveillance employed during the recent H1N1 (swine flu) pandemic, that these different 'registers' of biosurveillance are now being bought into the same frame of reference to create new, ever more robust and finely calibrated systems of biological surveillance. In thinking through the political implications of the emergent collision, I outline here, employing work from Cooper, Katz, and Lyon how biosurveillance is becoming progressively domesticated and reflect on the potential this has for creating new, expansive, and very pervasive, forms of biological 'governmentality'.
机译:尽管术语“生物监视”的使用频率越来越高,但是在美国和英国分别理解和实践该概念的方式仍然存在差异。在本文中,我将首先探讨在每个地方采用的不同的认识论和地理方法来进行生物监视,并特别注意它们各自的运作规模。我还考虑了如何在每个司法管辖区对这些系统(一个国家的公民)的主体进行监视,并产生什么影响。我在本文中提出抗辩,并通过对最近的H1N1(猪流感)大流行期间采用的监视技术进行研究来说明,现在将这些不同的生物监视“记录”纳入同一个参考框架,以创造新的,前所未有的更强大且经过精密校准的生物监测系统。在思考紧急碰撞的政治影响时,我在这里概述了库珀,卡茨和里昂的研究成果,介绍了生物监视如何逐渐被驯化,并反思了其在创造新的,广泛的和非常普遍的生物形式方面的潜力。 “政府”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号