...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>History of psychiatry >The birth of schizophrenia or a very modern Bleyier: a close reading of Eugen Bleoler's 'Die Prognose der Dementia praecox' and a re-consideration of his contribution to psychiatry
【24h】

The birth of schizophrenia or a very modern Bleyier: a close reading of Eugen Bleoler's 'Die Prognose der Dementia praecox' and a re-consideration of his contribution to psychiatry

机译：精神分裂症的诞生或非常现代的Bleyier：仔细阅读Eugen Bleoler的“ Die Prognose der Dementia praecox”并重新考虑其对精神病学的贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

After Eugen Bleuler introduced 'schizophrenia' in 1908, the term was hotly debated but eventually led to the abandonment of Kraepelin's previous term 'dementia praecox'. Bleuler's contribution has subsequently been interpreted in two main ways. One tradition holds that Bleuler merely renamed 'dementia praecox' while conceptually continuing the Kraepelinian tradition. The other, focusing on Bleuler's characterization of 'dementia praecox' in terms of specific psychological alterations, accredits him with a genuine re-conceptualization. Based on a close reading of 'Die Prognose der Dementia praecox', the paper in which Bleuler first mentioned 'schizophrenia', we suggest a further interpretation of Bleuler's contribution and argue that the main motive for his re-conceptualization is to be found in his rejection of Kraepelinian nosology.
机译：自1908年Eugen Bleuler引入“精神分裂症”后，这个词就引起了激烈的争论，但最终导致了Kraepelin先前的“痴呆症”的放弃。随后以两种主要方式解释了布鲁勒的贡献。一种传统认为，布鲁勒（Bleuler）在概念上延续了克莱佩林（Kalepelinian）传统的同时，仅将其重命名为“老年痴呆症”。另一位则侧重于布莱勒对“痴呆症”的特定心理改变方面的描述，使他获得了真正的重新概念化。在对布鲁诺首先提到“精神分裂症”的论文《老年痴呆症的死亡》进行仔细阅读的基础上，我们建议对布鲁诺的贡献作进一步的解释，并认为他的重新构想的主要动机将在他的著作中找到。拒绝Kraepelinian疾病学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号