...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Nature-Based Tourism and Prey Vulnerability to Predators: A Reply to Fitzgerald and Stronza
【24h】

Nature-Based Tourism and Prey Vulnerability to Predators: A Reply to Fitzgerald and Stronza

机译：捕食者基于自然的旅游业和猎物易受伤害性：对Fitzgerald和Stronza的答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In a recent review [1] we developed a framework to identify potential ecological consequences of long-term benign interactions between humans and animals and to highlight potential deleterious effects of non-threatening wildlife viewing by tourists. Fitzgerald and Stronza [2] questioned our hypothesis stating that 'It sends a countervailing, mixed message to conservation stakeholders about the real importance of tourism for protecting wildlife' and claimed that we focused on negative points while ecotourism could bring many more benefits than costs to endangered animals. We fully agree that ecotourism, and more generally naturebased tourism, may provide net benefits that might outweigh the potential costs we have identified. However, to identify the trade-offs that might result from naturebased tourism, it is essential to identify all potential costs to properly evaluate the net benefits. Besides this main point, we believe that other aspects of our position were slightly mis-stated by Fitzgerald and Stronza [2] and we aim to correct these below.
机译：在最近的一篇综述中[1]，我们开发了一个框架，以识别人与动物之间长期良性互动的潜在生态后果，并突出显示游客不威胁野生动植物的潜在有害影响。 Fitzgerald和Stronza [2]质疑我们的假设，指出“它向保护利益相关者传达了反差错的信息，说明旅游业对于保护野生动植物的真正重要性”，并声称我们专注于负面观点，而生态旅游可以带来更多的收益，而不是成本。濒危动物。我们完全同意，生态旅游以及更一般的自然旅游可以带来的净收益可能会超过我们确定的潜在成本。但是，要确定基于自然旅游的权衡取舍，必须确定所有潜在成本以正确评估净收益。除了这一要点之外，我们认为Fitzgerald和Stronza [2]稍微误解了我们立场的其他方面，并且我们打算在下面纠正这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号