...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Ecology & Evolution >Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the perplexed
【24h】

Controversies in the evolutionary social sciences: a guide for the perplexed

机译：进化社会科学中的争议：困惑者指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

It is 25 years since modern evolutionary ideas were first applied extensively to human behavior, jump-starting a field of study once known as 'sociobiology', Over the years, distinct styles of evolutionary analysis have emerged within the social sciences. Although there is considerable complementarity between approaches that emphasize the study of psychological mechanisms and those that focus on adaptive fit to environments, there are also substantial theoretical and methodological differences. These differences have generated a recurrent debate that is now exacerbated by growing popular media attention to evolutionary human behavioral studies. Here, we provide a guide to current controversies surrounding evolutionary studies of human social behavior, emphasizing theoretical and methodological issues, Wa conclude that a greater use of formal models, measures of current fitness costs and benefits, and attention to adaptive tradeoffs, will enhance the power and reliability of evolutionary analyses of human social behavior. [References: 65]
机译：自从现代进化思想首次广泛应用于人类行为至今已有25年了，这开启了曾经被称为“社会生物学”的研究领域。这些年来，社会科学中出现了独特的进化分析风格。尽管强调心理机制研究的方法与侧重于适应环境的方法之间存在相当大的互补性，但在理论和方法上也存在很大差异。这些差异引起了反复的争论，而现在越来越流行的媒体对进化的人类行为研究的关注加剧了这种争论。在这里，我们提供了有关人类社会行为进化研究的当前争议的指南，着重于理论和方法论问题。我们得出结论，更多地使用形式化模型，当前适应性成本和收益的度量以及对适应性权衡的关注，将增强人类社会行为进化分析的能力和可靠性。 [参考：65]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号