...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Human Ecology >Yrjo Haila and Chuck Dyke (eds.): How Nature Speaks:The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition. Duke University Press, Durham, 2006
【24h】

Yrjo Haila and Chuck Dyke (eds.): How Nature Speaks:The Dynamics of the Human Ecological Condition. Duke University Press, Durham, 2006

机译：Yrjo Haila和Chuck Dyke（主编）：大自然的说话方式：人类生态状况的动态。杜克大学出版社，达勒姆，2006年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The separation of nature and culture, mind and body, or subject and object has been formalized in Western thinking by the Enlightenment. For many contemporary environmental philosophers the ills that have beset modern society,most notably since the industrial revolution, can be traced to these dichotomies in both theory and practice. By examining the place of humans in the universe encompassing planet Earth, we have come to realize that while people have attained a level of intellect to harness and control nature better than any other living organism, they have not escaped the constraints of “natural laws.” Culture and society simply cannot claim supremacy over nature. On the other hand, it would be incorrect to assume that nature necessarily opposes societies’ efforts in carving out their ecological niches, provided these are accomplished within the framework of dynamic stability. In brief, there is a need to acknowledge that humans have co-evolved with nature, but that somewhere along the way culture and society have rebelled against this idea, thus leading to the first environmental crisis in human history.
机译：启蒙运动在西方思想中已将自然与文化，思想与身体或主体与客体的分离正式化。对于许多当代环境哲学家来说，困扰现代社会的弊端，尤其是自工业革命以来，在理论和实践上都可以追溯到这些二分法。通过研究人类在围绕地球的宇宙中的位置，我们已经认识到，尽管人们已经比其他任何生物体都拥有更好地利用和控制自然的理智水平，但他们没有逃脱“自然法则”的限制。 ”文化和社会根本不能声称对自然的至高无上。另一方面，假设自然界必须在动态稳定的框架内完成，自然就必然会反对社会努力消灭其生态位。简而言之，有必要承认人类已经与自然一起进化，但是在文化和社会反叛的过程中，有人反驳了这一想法，从而导致了人类历史上的第一次环境危机。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号