...
首页> 外文期刊>Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America >Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 tesla versus 3.0 tesla.
【24h】

Neurovascular imaging at 1.5 tesla versus 3.0 tesla.

机译:1.5特斯拉vs 3.0特斯拉的神经血管成像。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The primary advantage of high field strength MR imaging over imaging on modern 1.5 Tesla (T) systems is increased signal-to-noise ratio, which can be used to improve image quality or shorten scan acquisition time. In the years since 3.0T scanners were first approved for clinical use, one of the areas which has benefited greatly from its introduction is neurovascular MR angiography (MRA). Early experience has shown significant improvements in resolution and image quality. Whether high field strength MRA is robust or accurate enough to replace digital subtraction angiography in the foreseeable future remains to be seen. This article discusses the current state of neurovascular MRA at 3.0T, basic physical differences between MR imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T, and their effects on MRA sequences. The literature regarding the efficacy of 3.0T MRA techniques for diagnosing specific neurovascular pathologies and carotid steno occlusive disease is reviewed.
机译:与现代1.5 Tesla(T)系统上的成像相比,高场强MR成像的主要优点是提高了信噪比,可用于提高图像质量或缩短扫描采集时间。自从3.0T扫描仪首次被批准用于临床以来,多年来,从其引入中受益匪浅的领域之一就是神经血管MR血管造影(MRA)。早期经验表明,分辨率和图像质量有了显着改善。在可预见的将来,高场强MRA是否足够坚固或足以替代数字减影血管造影仍有待观察。本文讨论了3.0T时神经血管MRA的当前状态,1.5T和3.0T时MR成像之间的基本物理差异以及它们对MRA序列的影响。综述了有关3.0T MRA技术在诊断特定神经血管病变和颈动脉狭窄闭塞性疾病中的功效的文献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号