...
首页> 外文期刊>Vaccine >'All that palsies is not Bell's [1]'—The need to define Bell's palsy as an adverse event following immunization
【24h】

'All that palsies is not Bell's [1]'—The need to define Bell's palsy as an adverse event following immunization

机译:“所有的麻痹都不是贝尔的[1]” —需要将贝尔的麻痹定义为免疫接种后的不良事件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bell's palsy has been reported as an adverse event following immunization (AEFI). Review of the published literature reveals that several characteristics have been used to describe Bell's palsy, which differ significantly from author to author. Evidently, the definition of "Bell's palsy" remains controversial, and consensus between different medical subspecialties is urgently needed. The Brighton Collaboration has formed an international working group with representatives of neurology, otorhinolaryngology, pediatrics, electrophysiology, pharmacology, pharmaceutical and biotech industry as well as regulatory agencies to create a case definition of Bell's palsy as an AEFI.
机译:据报道,贝尔麻痹是免疫接种后的不良事件(AEFI)。对已发表文献的回顾表明,已经使用了几种特征来描述贝尔的麻痹,这在作者之间存在显着差异。显然,“贝尔氏麻痹”的定义仍存在争议,并且迫切需要在不同医学亚专业之间达成共识。布莱顿协作组织已经成立了一个国际工作组,由神经病学,耳鼻喉科,儿科,电生理学,药理学,制药和生物技术行业以及监管机构的代表组成,以创建贝尔麻痹作为AEFI的病例定义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号