...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Dermatologic surgery >Invagination stripping with ultrasound-guided perivenous tumescence: an original method of great saphenous vein stripping.
【24h】

Invagination stripping with ultrasound-guided perivenous tumescence: an original method of great saphenous vein stripping.

机译：超声引导下静脉肿大的内陷剥离术：一种大隐静脉剥离术的原始方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive treatment of the great saphenous vein (GSV) is now preferred over stripping, in some cases, stripping is still necessary. However, stripping, as an invasive method of treatment, promotes significant bleeding and trauma to the saphenous vein track. OBJECTIVE: To describe an original method of GSV stripping, reducing bleeding during procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Seventeen patients underwent stripping of 29 GSVs using tumescent infusion in the saphenous compartment guided by ultrasound, similar to the tumescent anesthesia used in laser ablation during treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency. RESULTS: Less bleeding and shorter recovery time was observed than in conventional GSV stripping. CONCLUSION: GSV stripping using tumescent ultrasound-guided technique promotes less bleeding than conventional stripping and should be always performed when GSV stripping is considered. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.
机译：背景：尽管现在大隐隐静脉（GSV）的微创治疗优于剥离术，但在某些情况下，剥离术仍然是必要的。然而，剥离作为一种侵入性治疗方法，会促进大隐静脉径迹的大量出血和创伤。目的：描述GSV剥离的原始方法，以减少手术过程中的出血。方法和材料：17例患者在超声引导下在隐性室中进行肿胀输注，剥离了29个GSV，类似于在隐性静脉功能不全治疗中用于激光消融的肿胀麻醉。结果：与传统的GSV剥离相比，出血更少，恢复时间更短。结论：使用肿胀超声引导技术的GSV剥离比常规剥离具有更少的出血，在考虑GSV剥离时应始终进行。作者表示对商业支持者没有太大兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号