...
首页> 外文期刊>Dermatologic surgery >Commentary: Are all fractional resurfacing devices equal with regard to induction of fibrosis?
【24h】

Commentary: Are all fractional resurfacing devices equal with regard to induction of fibrosis?

机译:评论:就纤维化诱发而言,所有分数换肤装置是否均等?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the era of fractional resurfacing, new lasers have been developed using nonablative and ablative technology. Many clinical indications including scars and photoaging can be approached using either modality. Some might argue that a series of treatment sessions using a nonablative fractional device yield similar results to a single ablative procedure, whereas others prefer fractional ablation. Given that fractional ablation entails epidermal and dermal vaporization in addition to coagulation, differences in wound healing between the two types of procedures are not unexpected.
机译:在部分重铺表面的时代,已经使用非烧蚀和烧蚀技术开发了新的激光器。可以使用任何一种方法来接近许多临床适应症,包括疤痕和光老化。有些人可能会争辩说,使用非烧蚀性分数器械进行的一系列治疗会产生与单一烧蚀过程相似的结果,而另一些人则更喜欢分数性切除术。鉴于部分消融除凝结外还需要表皮和真皮汽化,因此两种手术之间的伤口愈合差异并不意外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号