...
首页> 外文期刊>Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing >Measurement of Trust Over Time in Hybrid Inspection Systems
【24h】

Measurement of Trust Over Time in Hybrid Inspection Systems

机译:混合检查系统中随时间推移的信任度度量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study was conducted to measure the effects of human trust and to determine how it develops over time in a hybrid inspection system given different types of errors (i.e., false alarms and misses). The study also looked at which of the four dimensions of trust (competence, predictability, reliability, and faith) were the best predictors of overall trust. Results from the study showed that trust is sensitive to the type of errors made by a system. There was a significant change in overall trust between the stages for the conservative and risky systems, but no significant change in the neutral system. In regards to the best predictors of trust, faith appeared as one of the predictors in all three trial blocks for the conservative and risky systems. As time progressed, predictability emerged in the second and third trial blocks for the conservative system. Competence played an important role in the development of trust for the risky system, whereas reliability played an important role for the neutral system. These results suggest that subjective ratings of trust and the properties of the system can be used to predict the allocation of functions in hybrid inspection systems.
机译:进行了一项研究,以测量人类信任的影响并确定在给定不同类型的错误(即错误警报和遗漏)的混合检查系统中人类信任如何随时间发展。该研究还研究了信任的四个维度(能力,可预测性,可靠性和信念)中哪一个是整体信任的最佳预测指标。研究结果表明,信任对系统所犯错误的类型很敏感。在保守和风险系统的各个阶段之间,总体信任度发生了重大变化,但在中立系统中则没有显着变化。关于信任的最佳预测因素,在保守和风险系统的所有三个试验阶段中,信念都是预测因素之一。随着时间的流逝,在保守系统的第二和第三试验块中出现了可预测性。能力在风险系统的信任发展中起着重要作用,而可靠性对中立系统起着重要作用。这些结果表明,主观信任度和系统属性可用于预测混合检查系统中的功能分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号