...
首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes research and clinical practice >Comment on: 'Evaluation and comparison of guidelines for the management of people with type 2 diabetes from eight European countries' by Stone et al. on behalf of the GUIDANCE study group (Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87(2): 252-60).
【24h】

Comment on: 'Evaluation and comparison of guidelines for the management of people with type 2 diabetes from eight European countries' by Stone et al. on behalf of the GUIDANCE study group (Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010; 87(2): 252-60).

机译:评论:Stone等人的“来自八个欧洲国家的2型糖尿病患者管理指南的评估和比较”。代表指导研究小组(Diabetes Res Clin Pract.2010; 87(2):252-60)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The authors compared eight national type 2 diabetes guidelines for key process and outcome indicators. The comparison was performed after accurate selection, and quality of the different guidelines was assessed by means of the AGREE instrument, developed to address the issue of variability in guideline quality. Unless this precise methodological description some concerns remain after reading the paper.
机译:作者比较了八项国家2型糖尿病指南的关键过程和结果指标。在准确选择之后进行比较,并通过开发用于解决指南质量可变性问题的AGREE仪器评估不同指南的质量。除非有这种精确的方法学说明,否则在阅读本文后仍会有些顾虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号