...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Disability and rehabilitation. >A head-to-head comparison of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) in an older acute medical population
【24h】

A head-to-head comparison of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) and Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS) in an older acute medical population

机译：老年急性医疗人群的de Morton流动指数（DEMMI）和老年人流动量表（EMS）的正面对比

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose: To compare the clinimetric properties of the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI (R)) and the Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS). Method: A head-to-head comparison of the EMS and DEMMI (R) with 120 consecutive older acute medical patients. The DEMMI (R) and EMS were administered within 48 h of hospital admission and discharge. Results: At admission, 6% and 15% of participants scored the lowest scale score for the DEMMI (R) and EMS, respectively. For the DEMMI (R), 17% of participants scored within the minimal detectable change of the lowest scale score compared to 20% for the EMS at admission. At hospital discharge, DEMMI (R) scores were normally distributed and the EMS had a ceiling effect. Similar evidence of convergent, discriminant and known groups validity were obtained for the DEMMI (R) and EMS. There was no significant difference in responsiveness to change between the DEMMI (R) and EMS. The EMS was significantly quicker to administer compared to the DEMMI (R). Conclusion: The DEMMI (R) and EMS are both valid measures of mobility for older acute medical patients. The DEMMI (R) has a broader scale width than the EMS with interval level measurement and therefore provides a more accurate method for measuring and monitoring changes in mobility for older acute medical patients.
机译：目的：比较de Morton流动指数（DEMMI（R））和老年人流动量表（EMS）的斜度特性。方法：与120名连续的老年急性医疗患者进行EMS和DEMMI（R）的面对面比较。 DEMMI（R）和EMS在入院和出院后48小时内给药。结果：入院时，分别有6％和15％的参与者在DEMMI（R）和EMS方面得分最低。对于DEMMI（R），在最低量表分数的最小可检测变化范围内得分的参与者为17％，而在入学时，EMS的得分为20％。出院时，DEMMI（R）分数呈正态分布，EMS具有上限效应。对于DEMMI（R）和EMS，获得了相似的证据，表明收敛，有区别和已知的群体有效性。 DEMMI（R）和EMS之间对变化的响应能力没有显着差异。与DEMMI（R）相比，EMS的管理速度明显更快。结论：DEMMI（R）和EMS都是老年急性医疗患者活动性的有效指标。与带有间隔水平测量的EMS相比，DEMMI（R）具有更宽的标度宽度，因此提供了一种更准确的方法来测量和监视老年急性医疗患者的活动性变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号