• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>DTW:Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift >'Reasonable cause'--an undefined legal term for the justification of the killing of equids
【24h】

'Reasonable cause'--an undefined legal term for the justification of the killing of equids

机译：“合理原因”-杀害马匹的理由的未定义法律术语

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Killing of a vertebrate animal in Germany is allowed or not punishable only if a "reasonable cause" can be identified (Article 17 No. 1 TierSchG). A legal definition of the term "reasonable cause" does not exist. Currently the following definitions of the "reasonable cause" for the killing of equids are accepted: 1. Slaughter (in accordance with the equid pass and waiting periods) reasonable cause: Food production, initiated by the owner's desire. The requirements for slaughter of a sick animal or an emergency slaughter are defined through EU-legislations. 2. Euthanasia (in its original meaning) Reasonable cause: a) Compassion, initiated through medical indication b) scientific purposes (experimental animals) initiated through governmental authorization of a research request c) Epidemiological reasons initiated through veterinary legislative measures. According to the law for the protection of animals (TierSchG) "non curable pain or suffering" is a prerequisite for the killing of an animal because of a medical indication. Presuming an adequate knowledge base of the veterinarian this should leave enough room for an adequate medically reasoned decision. However, both a faulty veterinary explanation of a reasonable cause and an undue delay of the euthanasia (follow Article 17) can lead to an illegal punishable act (severe pain or suffering). Examples of veterinary medical indications for euthanasia will be presented. In addition, the question whether euthanasia can be considered as an alternative to treatment will be discussed. Finally, the more restrictive interpretations of the "reasonable cause" put forth by insurance companies will be explained. Future higher court decisions should lead to an adaptation of the insurance companies' interpretations of the "reasonable cause" to the outline presented above.
机译：仅在能够确定“合理原因”的情况下，才允许或不惩罚在德国杀害脊椎动物的行为（TierSchG第17条第1款）。术语“合理原因”的法律定义不存在。目前，以下关于杀害马匹的“合理原因”的定义是可以接受的：1.屠宰（根据马力通过和等待时间）是合理的原因：粮食生产，是由主人的意愿发起的。欧盟立法规定了对生病动物或紧急屠宰的要求。 2.安乐死（按其原始含义）是由以下原因造成的：a）通过医学适应症引起的同情b）通过政府对研究请求的授权启动的科学目的（实验动物）c）通过兽医立法措施引起的流行病学原因。根据保护动物的法律（TierSchG），“不可治愈的疼痛或痛苦”是由于医学上的原因而杀死动物的先决条件。假设有足够的兽医知识基础，这将为医学上合理的决定留出足够的空间。但是，兽医对合理原因的错误解释和安乐死的不适当延误（遵循第17条）都可能导致违法的惩处（严重的痛苦或痛苦）。将介绍安乐死的兽医医学适应症实例。此外，还将讨论安乐死是否可以被视为治疗的替代品的问题。最后，将解释保险公司对“合理原因”的更严格的解释。将来更高级别的法院判决将使保险公司对“合理原因”的解释适应上述概述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号