• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>DTW:Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift >Legal consideration of permit issuance under Article 11 par. 1 no. 3 letter(d) of the German Animal Welfare Act
【24h】

Legal consideration of permit issuance under Article 11 par. 1 no. 3 letter(d) of the German Animal Welfare Act

机译：第11条第1款规定的许可证发放的法律考虑。 1号《德国动物福利法》的3个字母（d）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The article looks at the legal situation concerning the permission for commercial activities with animals due to Article 11 par. 1 no.3 (d) of the German Animal Welfare Act, in particular in combination with activities at changing places. Regardingly the German legislator has recently (especially since 1998) started to approach the problems of animal welfare by adopting specific regulations, e. g. by enacting an obligation to inform the authority of the planned change of place of activity. Currently the legislator discusses an extension of the enabling act for an ordinance by the Federal Government on the central register for circusses. Standardized data collection and transmission shall contribute to an effective control of the companies' compliance with animal welfare law. Article 11 par. 2a of the German Animal Welfare Act is an important regulation concerning activities at changing places. It allows to combine the permission with time limits, conditions and impositions of duties. Such collateral clauses can be set down to keep an animal stock book or--in a wider sense--a documentation of the company's activities to guarantee an effective control by the authority. In the case of American rodeo shows it is to mention that collateral clauses to introduce more animal welfare are imposed by the local authorities responsible for the area where the shows will take place rather than by the authority which actually has given the permission. The authorities have to distinguish subsequent collateral clauses or directives on one hand and the revocation of the permission on the other hand, since in this case the requirements are more strict. The recent preliminary judicial decisions of the administrative courts concerning this legal problem are contradictory so that they cannot serve as a guideline for the authorities.
机译：该条款着眼于第11条第11款所指的允许与动物进行商业活动的法律情况。 《德国动物福利法》第1条第3款（d）项，特别是结合在变迁场所的活动。值得一提的是，德国立法者最近（尤其是1998年以来）开始通过采用具体法规来解决动物福利问题。 G。通过制定一项义务将计划中的活动地点变更通知当局。目前，立法者正在讨论将授权法案扩展为联邦政府在马戏团中央登记簿上的一项法令。标准化的数据收集和传输应有助于有效控制公司遵守动物福利法的情况。第11条的规定。 《德国动物福利法》第2a条是有关在变化的地方进行活动的重要规定。它允许将许可与时间限制，条件和职责相结合。可以设置此类附带条款，以保留动物存货簿，或者在更广泛的意义上保留公司活动的文档，以确保由当局进行有效控制。就美国牛仔竞技表演而言，要提到引入更多动物福利的附带条款是由负责表演的地区的地方当局而不是实际上获得许可的当局强加的。当局一方面必须区分随后的附带条款或指示，另一方面又要撤销许可，因为在这种情况下，要求更加严格。行政法院最近就这一法律问题作出的初步司法裁决是相互矛盾的，因此它们不能作为当局的指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号