• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Drug safety: An international journal of medical toxicology and drug experience >Healthcare professionals self-reported experiences and preferences related to direct healthcare professional communications: A survey conducted in the Netherlands
【24h】

Healthcare professionals self-reported experiences and preferences related to direct healthcare professional communications: A survey conducted in the Netherlands

机译：医护专业人员自我报告的经验和与直接医护专业人员交流相关的偏好：在荷兰进行的一项调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: In Europe, Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) are important tools to inform healthcare professionals of serious, new drug safety issues. However, this tool has not always been successful in effectively communicating the desired actions to healthcare professionals. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore healthcare providers' experiences and their preferences for improvement of risk communication, comparing views of general practitioners (GPs), internists, community pharmacists and hospital pharmacists.Methods: A questionnaire was developed and pilot tested to assess experiences and preferences of Dutch healthcare professionals with DHPCs. The questionnaire and two reminders were sent to a random sample of 3488 GPs, internists and community and hospital pharmacists in the Netherlands. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic characteristics of the respondents. Chi squares, ANOVAs and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used, when appropriate, to compare healthcare professional groups. Results: The overall response rate was 34% (N= 1141, ranging from 24% for internists to 46% for community pharmacists). Healthcare providers trusted safety information more when provided by the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) than by the pharmaceutical industry. This was more the case for GPs than for the other healthcare professionals. Respondents preferred safety information to be issued by the MEB, the Dutch Pharmacovigilance Center or their own professional associations. The preferred alternative channels of drug safety information were e-mail, medical journals and electronic prescribing systems.
机译：背景：在欧洲，直接医疗保健专业通信（DHPC）是向医疗保健专业人士通报严重的新药品安全问题的重要工具。但是，该工具并不总是成功地将所需的措施传达给医疗保健专业人员。目的：本研究旨在探讨医疗保健提供者的经验及其对改善风险沟通的偏好，比较全科医生（GPs），内科医生，社区药师和医院药师的观点。通过DHPC评估荷兰医疗保健专业人员的经验和偏好。问卷和两次提醒被发送到荷兰的3488名GP，内科医生，社区和医院药剂师的随机样本中。描述性统计用于描述受访者的人口统计特征。在适当的情况下，使用卡方检验，方差分析和Wilcoxon签署秩检验来比较医疗保健专业人士。结果：总体回应率为34％（N = 1141，范围从内科医生的24％到社区药师的46％）。当由荷兰药品评估委员会（MEB）提供的医疗保健提供者对安全性信息的信任程度超过了制药行业。全科医生比其他医疗专业人员更是如此。受访者偏爱由MEB，荷兰药物警戒中心或他们自己的专业协会发布的安全信息。首选的药物安全信息替代渠道是电子邮件，医学期刊和电子处方系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号