• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cladistics: The international journal of the Willi Hennig Society >Ending a decade of deception: a valiant failure, a not-so-valiant failure, and a success story
【24h】

Ending a decade of deception: a valiant failure, a not-so-valiant failure, and a success story

机译：结束十年的欺骗：英勇的失败，不那么英勇的失败和成功的故事

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Prior studies involving two methods, Brooks Parsimony Analysis (BPA) and TreeMap, have found BPA to be the more reliable method. Recent criticisms leveled at these studies argue that the tests were unfairly created and biased in favor of BPA. The authors of a recent critique offered new exemplars to demonstrate flaws in BPA, plus a simple fix to correct the flaws found in TreeMap. A re-evaluation of their exemplars clearly shows that the authors' calculations are incorrect, their understanding of the methods is lacking, and that their simple fix does not work. Additional analyses using TreeMap 2.02 are run to show that TreeMap 2.02, like TreeMap 1.0, cannot adequately deal with widespread parasites, contrary to the claims of its supporters. Furthermore, the exemplars corroborate previous findings that BPA, when calculated correctly, is more reliable than TreeMap1.0 and TreeMap 2.02 and therefore the method of choice in coevolutionary and biogeographic studies.
机译：涉及两种方法的先前研究，Brooks Parsimony Analysis（BPA）和TreeMap，发现BPA是更可靠的方法。这些研究最近受到批评，认为这些测试是不公平的，并且偏向于BPA。最近的评论的作者提供了新的范例来演示BPA中的缺陷，以及一个简单的修复方法来纠正TreeMap中发现的缺陷。对示例的重新评估清楚地表明，作者的计算是错误的，缺乏对方法的理解，而且简单的解决方法也不起作用。运行使用TreeMap 2.02进行的其他分析表明，TreeMap 2.02和TreeMap 1.0一样，不能充分处理广泛的寄生虫，这与其支持者的主张相反。此外，示例证明了以前的发现，即正确计算BPA比TreeMap1.0和TreeMap 2.02更可靠，因此是共同进化和生物地理研究的首选方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号