首页> 外文期刊>World Development >The Ambivalent Impact of Coffee Certification on Farmers' Welfare: A Matched Panel Approach for Cooperatives in Central Kenya
【24h】

The Ambivalent Impact of Coffee Certification on Farmers' Welfare: A Matched Panel Approach for Cooperatives in Central Kenya

机译:咖啡认证对农民福利的歧义影响:肯尼亚中部合作社的配对面板方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Certification is promoted to improve rural welfare through better market access and improved agricultural practices. We compare net effects of Fairtrade- and Utz-Certified coffee production in Central Kenya, using a matched panel from 218 farm-households that belong to three cooperatives and were visited twice in 2009 and 2013. We distinguish between effects at field, farm, household, cooperative, community, and market levels. Both certification regimes improved coffee returns, but Fairtrade was more effective in coffee processing, whereas Utz contributed to productivity. Under stagnating coffee prices, Fairtrade farmers increased their coffee specialization, while Utz farmers reduced coffee areas but increased yield. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:通过更好的市场准入和改善的农业实践,促进认证以改善农村福利。我们使用来自三个合作社的218家农户的匹配面板,比较了肯尼亚中部获得公平贸易和Utz认证的咖啡的净效益,分别在2009年和2013年进行了两次访问。我们区分了田间,农场,家庭的影响,合作社,社区和市场级别。两种认证制度都提高了咖啡的回报率,但公平贸易在咖啡加工方面更有效,而Utz促进了生产力。在咖啡价格停滞的情况下,公平贸易的农民增加了咖啡的专业化程度,而Utz农民减少了咖啡面积,但增加了产量。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号