...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >An Examination of 'Nonleadership': From Laissez-Faire Leadership to Leader Reward Omission and Punishment Omission
【24h】

An Examination of 'Nonleadership': From Laissez-Faire Leadership to Leader Reward Omission and Punishment Omission

机译：对“非领导力”的考察：从自由放任的领导力到领导者的奖励遗漏和惩罚遗漏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Laissez-faire leadership has received much less attention than have the 3 transactional leadership dimensions of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). However, laissez-faire leadership has shown strong negative relationships with various leadership criteria, and the absence of leadership (laissez-faire leadership) may be just as important as is the presence of other types of leadership. This article focuses on a single type of laissez-faire leadership (i.e.. the lack of response to subordinate performance). Using a reinforcement perspective. the authors developed measures and examined the effects of the lack of performance-contingent reinforcement in 2 forms: reward omission (leader nonreinforcement of good subordinate performance) and punishment omission (leader nonreinforcement of poor subordinate performance). They found strong, evidence in support of the construct validity of the new measures and found that omission was related to follower satisfaction with the leader, subordinate-rated leader effectiveness, subordinate-perceived role clarity, and supervisor-rated subordinate performance.
机译：与多因素领导问卷（MLQ）的三个交易领导维度相比，自由放任的领导受到的关注要少得多。但是，自由放任的领导与各种领导标准之间显示出强烈的消极关系，而缺乏领导（自由放任的领导）可能与其他类型的领导同样重要。本文着眼于一种类型的自由放任式领导（即对下属绩效缺乏回应）。使用加固视角。作者制定了措施并以两种形式检查了缺乏绩效依存强化的影响：奖励遗漏（领导者不强化下属表现良好）和惩罚遗漏（领导者不强化下属表现不良）。他们发现了强有力的证据来支持新措施的结构有效性，并发现遗漏与跟随者对领导者的满意度，下属领导者的有效性，下属感知角色的明确性以及上级领导对下属的绩效有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号