• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach
【24h】

Examining the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups: A categorization-elaboration approach

机译：组中检查目标故障线的不对称影响：一种分类详细方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to use the categorization-elaboration model (CEM) to examine the asymmetrical effects of goal faultlines in groups, which are present when hypothetical dividing lines are created on the basis of different performance goals, splitting the group into subgroups. On the basis of the CEM, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit higher levels of creative task performance than (a) groups with specific, difficult goals and (b) groups with do-your-best goals. We expected the benefits of goal faultlines to be due to increases in reflective reframing, which occurs when group members build on each other's ideas by shifting to alternate frames. However, we expected groups with goal faultlines to exhibit lower levels of routine task performance than (a) groups with do-your-best goals and (b) groups with specific, difficult goals, due to increased perceptions of loafing. Results from 87 groups generally supported our hypothesized model. Implications are discussed as well as possible limitations and directions for future research.
机译：这项研究的目的是使用分类精细化模型（CEM）来检查目标错线在组中的不对称影响，当基于不同的绩效目标创建假设的分隔线并将组划分为子组时会出现这种情况。基于CEM，我们期望具有目标断层线的小组比（a）具有特定困难目标的小组和（b）具有“尽力而为”目标的小组表现出更高水平的创意任务绩效。我们预计目标错误线的好处将归因于反射重新构图的增加，这是在小组成员通过转移到其他框架来建立彼此的思想时发生的。但是，由于人们对面包的感觉增加了，因此我们期望具有目标缺陷线的小组表现出比（a）具有最佳目标的小组和（b）具有特定的困难目标的小组更低的例行任务执行水平。来自87个小组的结果通常支持我们的假设模型。讨论了含义以及未来研究的可能局限和方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号