...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >When Do Fair Procedures Not Matter? A Test of the Identity Violation Effect
【24h】

When Do Fair Procedures Not Matter? A Test of the Identity Violation Effect

机译：什么时候没有公平程序？身份冲突效应的检验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Considerable research has demonstrated that fair procedures help improve reactions to decisions, a phenomenon known as the fair process effect. However, in the present research, the authors identify when and why objectively fair procedures (i.e., receiving voice) may not always improve justice perceptions. Findings from 2 studies (N_s = 108 and 277) yield support for the proposed identity violation effect, which positsthat when an outcome violates a central aspect of one's self (i.e., personal and/or social identity), objectively fair procedures do not improve procedural and distributive justice perceptions. Further, consistent with the motivated reasoning hypothesis, the Voice × Identity Violation interaction on justice perceptions was mediated by participants' tendency to find a procedural flaw—namely, to doubt that opinions were considered before making the decision.
机译：大量研究表明，公平程序有助于改善对决策的反应，这种现象被称为公平过程效应。然而，在本研究中，作者确定了何时以及为什么客观地公正的程序（即接收声音）可能并不能总是改善正义感。来自2个研究（N_s = 108和277）的研究结果为拟议的身份违背效应提供了支持，该假设认为，当结果侵犯了个人自我的核心方面（即个人和/或社会身份）时，客观公正的程序不会改善程序和分配正义的观念。此外，与动机推理假设相一致，参与者对正义感的声音×身份冲突的交互作用是由参与者发现程序缺陷的倾向来调节的，即倾向于怀疑在做出决定之前是否考虑了意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号