...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >A Review of the Content, Criterion-Related, and Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Exercises
【24h】

A Review of the Content, Criterion-Related, and Construct-Related Validity of Assessment Center Exercises

机译:评估中心练习的内容,与标准有关和与构造有关的有效性的回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study uses meta-analysis and a qualitative review of exercise descriptions to evaluate the content, criterion-related, construct, and incremental validity of 5 commonly used types of assessment center (AC) exercises. First, we present a meta-analysis of the relationship between 5 types of AC exercises with (a) the other exercise types, (b) the 5-factor model of personality, (c) general mental ability (GMA), and (d) relevant criterion variables. All 5 types of exercises were significantly related to criterion variables (rho = .16-.19). The nomological network analyses suggested that the exercises tend to be modestly associated with GMA, Extraversion and, to a lesser extent, Openness to Experience but largely unrelated to Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Emotional Stability. Finally, despite sparse reporting in primary studies, a content analysis of exercise descriptions yielded some evidence of complexity, ambiguity, interpersonal interaction, and fidelity but not necessarily interdependence.
机译:这项研究使用荟萃分析和对运动说明的定性评估,来评估5种常用类型的评估中心(AC)运动的内容,与标准相关,构造和增量有效性。首先,我们对5种类型的AC锻炼与(a)其他锻炼类型,(b)人格的五因素模型,(c)总体智力(GMA)和(d)之间的关系进行了荟萃分析。 )相关标准变量。所有5种类型的练习都与标准变量显着相关(rho = .16-.19)。法理网络的分析表明,这些练习通常与GMA,外向性和适度的开放感相关,但在很大程度上与亲和力,尽责性和情绪稳定性无关。最后,尽管在基础研究中报告很少,但对运动描述的内容分析却提供了一些复杂性,歧义性,人际互动性和忠诚度的证据,但不一定相互依赖。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号