...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression
【24h】

Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression

机译：流离失所的侵略行为造成的虐待监督和家庭破坏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study focuses on factors that contribute to abusive super-vision, one form of nonphysical aggression, and the results of such abuse on subordinates and their family members. Using a "kick the dog" metaphor (As Marcus-Newhall, Pedersen, Carlson, and Miller (2000) state, this is a "commonly used anecdote to illustrate displaced aggression...a man is berated by his boss but does not retaliate because he fears losing his job. Hours later, when he arrives home to the greeting barks of his dog he responds by kicking it," p. 670), the authors investigated whether abusive supervision may be the result of a supervisor's displeasure with his or her organization. Using a sample of 210 supervisors, their subordinates, and the subordinates' family members or partners, the authors hypothesized that super-visors' reports of psychological contract violations, moderated by hostile attribution bias, would be associated with subordinates' perceptions of abusive supervision. In turn, the authors hypothesized that abused subordinates' family members would report sustained negative affect and negative evaluations directed toward them in the home. The hypotheses were supported.
机译：这项研究的重点是导致滥用监督的因素，一种非身体攻击的形式以及对下属及其家人的这种虐待的结果。使用“踢狗”的比喻（如Marcus-Newhall，Pedersen，Carlson和Miller（2000）所说，这是“常用的轶事来说明流离失所的侵略...一个人受到老板的指责，但没有进行报复几个小时后，当他回到家中受到狗的问候吠叫时，他会踢它来回应，” p。670），作者调查了虐待性监督是否是由于监督者对他或他的狗狗不满所致。她的组织。作者使用了210名主管，其下属以及下属的家庭成员或伴侣的样本，假设在上级主管关于心理契约违规的报告中，由于敌对的归因偏见而受到影响，这与下属对滥用监督的看法有关。反过来，作者假设受虐待的下属的家庭成员将报告持续的负面影响和对他们在家中的负面评价。假设得到支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号