...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice
【24h】

The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice

机译：在人员选拔研究和实践中比较预测变量时，区​​分结构和方法的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The authors highlight the importance and discuss the criticality of distinguishing between constructs and methods when comparing predictors. They note that comparisons of constructs and methods in comparative evaluations of predictors result in outcomes that are theoretically to conceptually uninterpretable and thus potentially misleading. The theoretical and practical implications of the distinction between predictor constructs and predictor methods are discussed, with three important streams of personnel psychology research being used to frame this discussion. Researchers, editors, reviewers, educators, and consumers of research are urged to carefully consider the extent to which the construct-method distinction is made and maintained in their own research and that of others, especially when predictors are being compared. It is hoped that this discussion will reorient researchers and practitioners toward a more construct-oriented approach that is aligned with a scientific emphasis in personnel selection research and practice.
机译：作者在比较预测变量时强调了重要性，并讨论了区分结构和方法的重要性。他们指出，在对预测变量进行比较评估时，对结构和方法进行比较会导致从理论上讲概念上无法解释的结果，因此可能产生误导。讨论了预测变量构造和预测变量方法之间区别的理论和实践意义，并使用了三个重要的人员心理学研究流来对此进行讨论。敦促研究人员，研究人员，研究者，教育者和研究者认真考虑在自己的研究和其他研究中对构建方法的区分和保持的程度，尤其是在比较预测变量时。希望这种讨论将使研究人员和从业人员重新定向到一种更加注重结构的方法，该方法与人员选拔研究和实践中的科学重点保持一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号