• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied social psychology >Social comparison-based thoughts in groups: Their associations with interpersonal trust and learning outcomes
【24h】

Social comparison-based thoughts in groups: Their associations with interpersonal trust and learning outcomes

机译：小组中基于社会比较的思想：他们与人际信任和学习成果的联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study relates thoughts derived from 4 types of social comparison to trust and individual learning. Our study (N = 362 students) showed that upward identification (i.e., believing one is just as good as a better performing teammate) was positively related to trust and individual learning. Upward contrast (i.e., believing one is worse than a better performing group member) was negatively related to learning, as were downward-identifying thoughts (i.e., believing one will perform as badly as a poorly performing teammate). Downward contrast (i.e., thinking one can do much better than the poor performer) was negatively related to trust. We concluded that social comparison-based thoughts are important to consider when designing teamwork because of their constructive and destructive consequences.
机译：本研究将源自四种社会比较类型的思想与信任和个人学习联系起来。我们的研究（N = 362名学生）显示，向上的认同感（即，相信一个人与表现更好的队友一样好）与信任和个人学习成正相关。向上的对比（即，相信一个人比表现更好的团队成员更糟）与学习负相关，而向下识别的思想（即，认为一个人的表现与表现不佳的队友一样差）与学习负相关。向下的对比（即认为一个人可以比表现不佳的人做得更好）与信任负相关。我们得出结论，在设计团队合作时，基于社会比较的思想非常重要，因为它们具有建设性和破坏性的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号