首页> 外文期刊>Journal of athletic training >Normative and critical criteria for iliotibial band and iliopsoas muscle flexibility.
【24h】

Normative and critical criteria for iliotibial band and iliopsoas muscle flexibility.

机译:胫束和肌弹性的规范和关键标准。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

CONTEXT: The Ober and Thomas tests are subjective and involve a "negative" or positive evidence-based medicine. No authors have combined the subjective clinical assessment with an objective measurement for these special tests. OBJECTIVE: To compare the subjective assessment of iliotibial band and iliopsoas flexibility with the objective measurement of a digital inclinometer, to establish normative values, and to provide an evidence-based critical criterion for determining tissue tightness. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Clinical research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred recreational athletes (125 men, 175 women; 250 in injured group, 50 in control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Iliotibial band and iliopsoas muscle flexibility were determined subjectively using the modified Ober and Thomas tests, respectively. Using a digital inclinometer, we objectively measured limb position. Interrater reliability for the subjective assessment was compared between 2 clinicians for a random sample of 100 injured participants, who were classified subjectively as either negative or positive for iliotibial band and iliopsoas tightness. Percentage of agreement indicated interrater reliability for the subjective assessment. RESULTS: For iliotibial band flexibility, the average inclinometer angle was -24.59 degrees +/- 7.27 degrees . A total of 432 limbs were subjectively assessed as negative (-27.13 degrees +/- 5.53 degrees ) and 168 as positive (-16.29 degrees +/- 6.87 degrees ). For iliopsoas flexibility, the average inclinometer angle was -10.60 degrees +/- 9.61 degrees . A total of 392 limbs were subjectively assessed as negative (-15.51 degrees +/- 5.82 degrees ) and 208 as positive (0.34 degrees +/- 7.00 degrees ). The critical criteria for iliotibial band and iliopsoas flexibility were determined to be -23.16 degrees and -9.69 degrees , respectively. Between-clinicians agreement was very good, ranging from 95.0% to 97.6% for the Thomas and Ober tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective assessments and instrumented measurements were combined to establish normative values and critical criterions for tissue flexibility for the modified Ober and Thomas tests.
机译:语境:Ober和Thomas检验是主观的,涉及“阴性”或阳性循证医学。没有作者将这些特殊测试的主观临床评估与客观测量相结合。目的:比较胫束带和band肌柔韧性的主观评估与数字测斜仪的客观测量结果,以建立标准值,并为确定组织紧密度提供循证的关键标准。设计:横断面研究。地点:临床研究实验室。患者或其他参与者:三百名休闲运动员(男125例,女175例;受伤组250例,对照组50例)。主要观察指标:分别采用改良的Ober和Thomas检验主观确定I胫束带和骨肌的柔韧性。使用数字测斜仪,我们可以客观地测量肢体位置。在2名临床医生之间随机比较100名受伤参与者的主观评估的评估者间信度,这些参与者被主观分类为classified胫束带和op骨松紧度为阴性或阳性。一致性百分比表明主观评估具有较高的信度。结果:对于胫束柔性,平均倾角仪角度为-24.59度+/- 7.27度。主观评估共有432条肢体为阴性(-27.13度+/- 5.53度),有168条为阳性(-16.29度+/- 6.87度)。对于骨肌柔韧性,平均倾斜仪角度为-10.60度+/- 9.61度。主观评估共有392条肢体为阴性(-15.51度+/- 5.82度),有208条为阳性(0.34度+/- 7.00度)。胫束带和肌柔韧性的关键标准分别确定为-23.16度和-9.69度。临床医生之间的共识非常好,托马斯和奥伯检验的比例分别为95.0%至97.6%。结论:主观评估和仪器测量相结合,为改进的Ober和Thomas检验建立了组织柔韧性的标准值和关键标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号