...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical psychology >The PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure in a Nonclinical Sample
【24h】

The PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure in a Nonclinical Sample

机译：PTSD清单-平民版本：非临床样本中的可靠性，有效性和因素结构

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objectives: We examined the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the posttraumatic stress diorder (PTSD) Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C; Blanchard, Jones-Alexander, Buckley, & Forneris, 1996) among unselected undergraduate students. Participants: Participants were 471 undergraduate students at a large university in the Eastern United States and were not preselected based on trauma history or symptom severity. Results: The PCL-C demonstrated good internal consistency and retest reliability. Compared with alternative measures of PTSD, the PCL-C showed favorable patterns of convergent and discriminant validity. In contrast to previous research using samples with known trauma exposure, we found support for both 1-factor and 2-factor models of PTSD symptoms. Conclusions: Overall, the PCL-C appears to be a valid and reliable measure of PTSD symptoms, even among nonclinical samples, and is superior to some alternative measures of PTSD. The factor structure among nonclinical samples may not reflect each of the PTSD symptom "clusters" (i.e., reexperiencing, avoidanceumbing, and hyperarousal).
机译：目的：我们研究了未选拔的大学生创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）清单-平民版本（PCL-C; Blanchard，Jones-Alexander，Buckley和Forneris，1996）的可靠性，有效性和因子结构。参加者：参加者为美国东部一所大型大学的471名本科生，未根据创伤史或症状严重程度进行预选。结果：PCL-C表现出良好的内部一致性和重新测试的可靠性。与PTSD的替代措施相比，PCL-C表现出良好的收敛性和判别有效性模式。与先前使用已知创伤暴露样本进行的研究相比，我们发现支持PTSD症状的1因素模型和2因素模型。结论：总体而言，即使在非临床样本中，PCL-C似乎也是对PTSD症状的有效且可靠的度量，并且优于PTSD的某些替代度量。非临床样本中的因素结构可能无法反映每个PTSD症状的“簇”（即重新体验，避免/麻木和过度兴奋）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号