...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine >For debate: consensus injury definitions in team sports should focus on missed playing time.
【24h】

For debate: consensus injury definitions in team sports should focus on missed playing time.

机译：辩论：团队运动中的共识伤害定义应着重于缺席比赛时间。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To compare the most commonly used and proposed injury definitions for surveillance systems in team sports and attempt to assess their suitability for consensus definitions in terms of reliability and functionality. DATA SOURCES: The PubMed and SportDiscus databases were searched for papers on team sports that discussed consensus definitions or compared various definitions of injury. DATA SYNTHESIS: A continuum between the most broad "tissue damage" definition and the most narrow "match time loss only" definition was developed. RESULTS: A "match time loss only" injury definition can be reliably and accurately applied but only captures a small percentage of the total pool of all "tissue damage" injuries. There are some inherent biases in using a match time loss only definition (late season matches, matches with unequal breaks between games), but these are clearly visible. All other definitions improve the volume of data captured but suffer serious theoretical and/or practical flaws with respect to accuracy and reliability. No study using a broad definition has demonstrated good reliability to date (eg, using 2 independent recorders at the same team). CONCLUSION: A "match time loss only" injury definition is the most accurate and reliable of those commonly used in team sports. Other injury definitions are broader and may be more appropriate for individual team and specific injury studies. However, a match time loss definition is the most accurate and reliable tool for comparing injury rates at different teams and between different seasons within teams. Hence, we recommend this as the basis for the injury definition in a consensus statement.
机译：目的：比较团队运动监视系统中最常用和建议的伤害定义，并尝试从可靠性和功能性方面评估其对于共识定义的适用性。数据来源：在PubMed和SportDiscus数据库中搜索了关于团队运动的论文，这些论文讨论了共识定义或比较了各种伤害定义。数据综合：建立了最广泛的“组织损伤”定义和最狭窄的“仅比赛时间损失”定义之间的连续体。结果：“仅匹配时间损失”损伤定义可以可靠，准确地应用，但仅占所有“组织损伤”损伤总数的一小部分。使用仅比赛失时的定义存在一些固有的偏差（赛季末比赛，比赛之间休息不均等的比赛），但这些显而易见。所有其他定义都会提高捕获的数据量，但在准确性和可靠性方面会遭受严重的理论和/或实践缺陷。迄今为止，尚无使用广义定义的研究显示出良好的可靠性（例如，在同一团队中使用2个独立的记录器）。结论：“仅比赛损失时间”的伤害定义是团队运动中最常用和最准确的定义。其他伤害定义范围更广，可能更适合单个团队和特定伤害研究。但是，比赛时间损失的定义是比较不同球队以及球队不同赛季之间的受伤率的最准确，最可靠的工具。因此，我们建议将其作为共识声明中定义伤害的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号