...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of community psychology >UNDERSTANDING THE PHASES OF RECOVERY FROM SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS: THE ROLES OF REFERENT AND EXPERT POWER IN A MUTUAL-HELP SETTING
【24h】

UNDERSTANDING THE PHASES OF RECOVERY FROM SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS: THE ROLES OF REFERENT AND EXPERT POWER IN A MUTUAL-HELP SETTING

机译：了解严重精神疾病的恢复阶段：互助环境中参考和专家权力的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study explored an approach to studying recovery that is sensitive to the multiphase and contextual nature of the recovery process. The authors focused on the experience of recovery in a mutual-help group, Schizophrenics Anonymous (SA). Prior qualitative research conducted with SA revealed that SA participants experience four phases of recovery: (a) mourning and grief, (b) awareness and recognition, (c) redefinition and transformation, and (d) enhanced well-being and quality of life. Surveying a national sample of SA participants, they explored whether these four phases were predicted by different change mechanisms (i.e., referent and expert power) within SA and whether these mechanisms varied according to participants’ role in the organization. Referent and expert power were found to differentially relate to the phases of recovery for members and leaders. They conclude that our understanding of the processes and contexts that facilitate recovery can be enhanced by using recovery models that are setting-specific and reflect the multifaceted nature of the recovery process.
机译：这项研究探索了一种研究恢复的方法，该方法对恢复过程的多阶段和上下文性质敏感。作者重点研究了一个名为“精神分裂症匿名者”（SA）的互助小组的康复经验。与SA进行的先前定性研究表明，SA参与者经历了四个恢复阶段：（a）哀悼和悲伤，（b）意识和认可，（c）重新定义和转变，以及（d）改善幸福感和生活质量。他们调查了国家级SA参与者的样本，探讨了这四个阶段是否由SA内部不同的变化机制（即指点和专家权力）预测，以及这些机制是否根据参与者在组织中的角色而有所不同。发现参考和专家权限与成员和领导者的恢复阶段有不同的关系。他们得出结论，通过使用特定于设置并且反映了恢复过程的多面性的恢复模型，可以增强我们对促进恢复的过程和上下文的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号