...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias
【24h】

A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias

机译：两步的稿件提交过程可以减少出版偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Much of what is researched is never published. This would not be of great concern if the selection of what we read would occur irrespective of study outcomes. Unfortunately, the reverse is the case: "positive" studies have a much larger chance of acceptance after editorial and peer review than "negative" ones. Several solutions to this problem of publication bias have been discussed or implemented, but none seem to be very effective. In this article, the approach of implementing an editorial and peer-review procedure that is blinded to study outcomes is discussed. This would require a two-step submission procedure of manuscripts: first a version including just the introduction and methods and in some cases followed by a second submission including results and discussion. The pros and cons of such an approach are discussed.
机译：研究的大部分内容从未公开。如果我们选择阅读的内容与研究结果无关而不会引起太大的关注。不幸的是，情况恰恰相反：在编辑和同行评审之后，“积极”研究比“消极”研究有更大的接受机会。已经讨论或实施了解决该出版偏向问题的几种解决方案，但似乎没有一个非常有效。在本文中，讨论了对研究成果视而不见的实施编辑和同行评审程序的方法。这将需要两步的稿件提交程序：首先是稿件，仅包括介绍和方法，在某些情况下，其次是稿件，包括结果和讨论。讨论了这种方法的利弊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号