...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology >Modeling Turbulent Flow in an Urban Central Business District
【24h】

Modeling Turbulent Flow in an Urban Central Business District

机译:在城市中央商务区中模拟湍流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Realistic Urban Spread and Transport of Intrusive Contaminants (RUSTIC) model has been developed as a simplified computational fluid dynamics model with a k-u> turbulence model to be used to provide moderately fast simulations of turbulent airflowin an urban environment. RUSTIC simulations were compared with wind tunnel measurements to refine and "calibrate" the parameters for the k-a) model. RUSTIC simulations were then run and compared with data from five different periods during the Joint Urban 2003 experiment. Predictions from RUSTIC were compared with data from 33 near-surface sonic anemometers as well as 8 sonic anemometers on a 90-m tower and a sodar wind profiler located in the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, central business district. The data were subdivided into daytime and nighttime datasets and then the daytime data were further subdivided into exposed and sheltered sonic anemometers. While there was little difference between day and night for wind speed and direction comparisons, therewas considerable difference for the turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) comparisons. In the nighttime cases, RUSTIC overpredicted the TKE but without any correlation between model and observations. On the other hand, for the daytime cases, RUSTIC underpredicted the TKE values and correlated well with the observations. RUSTIC predicted both winds and TKE much better for the exposed sonic anemometers than for the sheltered ones. For the 90-m tower location downwind of the central business district, RUSTIC predicted the vertical profile of wind speed and direction very closely but underestimated the TKE.
机译:逼真的侵入性污染物城市扩散和运输(RUSTIC)模型已开发为具有k-u>湍流模型的简化计算流体动力学模型,可用于在城市环境中提供适度快速的湍流模拟。将RUSTIC模拟与风洞测量进行了比较,以完善和“校准” k-a)模型的参数。然后运行RUSTIC模拟,并将其与Joint Urban 2003实验中五个不同时期的数据进行比较。将RUSTIC的预测与位于中央商务区俄克拉荷马州俄克拉荷马城的90米塔楼和一台声纳风廓线仪上的33个近地声波风速仪以及8个声波风速仪的数据进行了比较。将数据细分为白天和夜间数据集,然后将白天数据进一步细分为裸露的和掩蔽的风速计。尽管昼夜之间风速和风向的差异不大,但湍流动能(TKE)的差异却相当大。在夜间情况下,RUSTIC高估了TKE,但模型与观测值之间没有任何关联。另一方面,对于白天的情况,RUSTIC低估了TKE值,并与观测值很好地相关。 RUSTIC预测,暴露于风速的风速仪的风速和TKE都比遮蔽风速仪好。对于中心商务区下风向90米的塔架位置,RUSTIC预测风速和风向的垂直剖面非常接近,但低估了TKE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号