...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economic Entomology >Comparison of two synthetic food-odor lures for captures of feral Mexican fruit flies (Diptera : Tephritidae) in Mexico and implications regarding use of irradiated flies to assess lure efficacy
【24h】

Comparison of two synthetic food-odor lures for captures of feral Mexican fruit flies (Diptera : Tephritidae) in Mexico and implications regarding use of irradiated flies to assess lure efficacy

机译：两种在墨西哥捕获墨西哥野生实蝇（Diptera：Tephritidae）的合成食物异味诱饵的比较及其对使用辐照蝇蝇评估诱饵效力的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Feral Mexican fruit flies, Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae), were trapped in a citrus orchard in Mexico by using two types of synthetic food-odor lures, the AFF lure (Anastrepha fruit fly lure, APTIV, Inc., Portland, OR) and the BioLure (two-component MFF lure, Suterra. LLC, Inc., Bend, OR). In Multilure traps (Better World Manufacturing, Inc., Miami, FL) containing water, BioLures captured. about the same numbers of flies as AFF lures. In Multilure traps containing antifreeze solution, BioLures captured 2 and 5 times more flies than AFF lures in two experiments. BioLures, and AFF lures did not differ in attractiveness when used on sticky traps (Intercept trap, APTIV, Inc.; and sticky cylinder trap). Multilure traps captured > 4 times as many flies as sticky traps with the exception that captures of females did not differ between Multilure and sticky traps baited with AFF lures. The percentage of females captured in Multilure traps was greater when traps were baited with BioLures compared with AFF lures, but the reverse was true for sticky traps. Sticky cylinder traps captured a higher percentage of females than Multilure traps. The most effective trap/lure combination was the Multilure trap baited with BioLure and antifreeze. In comparison with tests of these two lures in Texas, results were similar for Multilure traps, but they differed for sticky cylinder traps in that AFF lures were consistently more attractive than BioLures in Texas, but not in Mexico.
机译：墨西哥野生果蝇Anastrepha ludens（Loew）（Diptera：Tephritidae）通过使用两种类型的合成食物气味诱饵AFF诱饵（Anastrepha实蝇诱饵，APTIV，Inc.，波特兰）被困在墨西哥的柑桔园中。 ，俄勒冈州）和BioLure（两组分MFF诱饵，Suterra。LLC，Inc.，本德，俄勒冈州）。在装有水的多诱集器（Better World Manufacturing，Inc.，佛罗里达州迈阿密）中，捕获了生物诱集剂。与AFF诱饵数量相同。在包含防冻液的Multilure诱集器中，两次实验中，BioLures捕获的果蝇分别是AFF诱饵的2和5倍。当在粘性诱捕器（Intercept诱捕器，APTIV，Inc .;和粘性圆柱诱捕器）上使用时，BioLure和AFF诱饵的吸引力没有差异。多诱捕器捕获的果蝇是粘性诱捕器的> 4倍，不同之处在于，多诱饵和诱捕AFF诱饵的粘性诱捕器之间的雌性捕获没有差异。当用诱饵诱捕诱集器时，与AFF诱饵相比，在诱集诱捕器中捕获的雌性百分比更高，但对于粘性诱集器则相反。粘性圆柱诱捕器比多诱捕器捕获的雌性百分比更高。最有效的诱集/诱饵组合是采用BioLure和防冻剂诱集的Multilure诱集。与在德克萨斯州对这两种诱饵的测试相比，Multilure诱集器的结果相似，但对于粘性圆筒诱集器却有所不同，因为AFF诱饵在德克萨斯州比BioLures更具吸引力，但在墨西哥却没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号