...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : >Legal and ethical values in the resolution of research-related disputes: How can IRBs respond to participant complaints?
【24h】

Legal and ethical values in the resolution of research-related disputes: How can IRBs respond to participant complaints?

机译:解决与研究有关的争议中的法律和道德价值:IRB如何应对参与者的投诉?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

under us federal regulations, participants providing informed consent must receive information regarding whom to contact in case of a research-related injury or complaint. Although informed consent processes routinely direct participants to contact institutional review boards (IRBs) with questions or concerns, there has been little empirical study of the ways in which IRBs act to resolve participants' research-related complaints. This article explores available literature on participant complaints, considers the responsibilities of IRBs in dispute resolution, and outlines a research agenda. As a case study, this review considers disputes arising from HIV/AIDS research, focusing on novel issues arising from biomedical HIV prevention trials.
机译:根据我们的联邦法规,提供知情同意的参与者必须获得有关因研究相关的伤害或投诉而与谁联系的信息。尽管知情同意程序通常会引导参与者提出问题或疑虑,与机构审查委员会(IRB)联系,但对于IRB采取何种方式解决参与者与研究相关的投诉的方式,尚缺乏实证研究。本文探讨了有关参与者投诉的现有文献,考虑了内部评级法在解决争议中的责任,并概述了研究议程。作为案例研究,本次审查考虑了由HIV / AIDS研究引起的争议,重点是由生物医学预防HIV试验产生的新问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号