...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental monitoring: JEM >Cross-sensitivities of electrochemical detectors used to monitor worker exposures to airborne contaminants: False positive responses in the absence of target analytes
【24h】

Cross-sensitivities of electrochemical detectors used to monitor worker exposures to airborne contaminants: False positive responses in the absence of target analytes

机译:用于监测工人暴露于空气污染物中的电化学检测器的交叉敏感性:在没有目标分析物的情况下出现假阳性反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Ideally, the response of electrochemical detectors is proportional to the concentration of targeted airborne chemicals and is not be affected by concomitantly present substances. Manufacturers provide a limited list of cross-sensitivities but end-users have anecdotally reported unexpected interferences by other substances. Electrochemical detectors designed to measure airborne levels of CO, H2S, NO, NO2, or SO2, were challenged with potentially interfering substances in the absence of target analytes. Cross-sensitivities undocumented by the manufacturers were observed and were found to vary between different models of instruments for the same challenge chemical.
机译:理想情况下,电化学检测器的响应与目标航空化学品的浓度成正比,并且不受伴随存在的物质的影响。制造商提供的交叉敏感性清单非常有限,但最终用户已经轶事地报告了其他物质的意外干扰。在没有目标分析物的情况下,旨在测量空气中CO,H2S,NO,NO2或SO2含量的电化学检测器受到了潜在干扰物质的挑战。观察到制造商未记录的交叉敏感性,并且发现对于同一挑战化学品,不同型号的仪器之间存在交叉敏感性差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号