...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied >Voice in Political Decision-Making: The Effect of Group Voice on Perceived Trustworthiness of Decision Makers and Subsequent Acceptance of Decisions
【24h】

Voice in Political Decision-Making: The Effect of Group Voice on Perceived Trustworthiness of Decision Makers and Subsequent Acceptance of Decisions

机译：政治决策中的声音：集体声音对决策者感知的信任度和随后的决策接受度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The implementation of carbon dioxide capture and storage technology (CCS) is considered an important climate change mitigation strategy, but the viability of this technology will depend on public acceptance of CCS policy decisions. The results of three experiments with students as participants show that whether or not interest groups receive an opportunity to express their opinions in the decision-making process (i.e., group voice) affects acceptance of CCS policy decisions, with inferred trustworthiness of the decision maker mediating this effect. Decision-making procedures providing different interest groups with equal opportunities to voice their opinions instigate more trust in the decision maker and, in turn, lead to greater willingness to accept decisions compared to no-voice procedures (i.e., unilateral decision-making-Study 1) and unequal group-voice procedures (i.e., when one type of interest group receives voice, but another type of interest group does not-Study 2). Study 3 further shows that an individual's own level of knowledge about CCS moderates the desire for an opportunity for members of the general public to voice opinions in the decision-making process, inferred trustworthiness of decision makers, and policy acceptance. These results imply that people care about voice in decision-making even when they are not directly personally involved in the decision-making process. We conclude that people tend to use procedural information when deciding to accept or oppose policy decisions on political complex issues; hence, it is important that policymakers use fair group-voice procedures and that they communicate to the public how they arrive at their decisions.
机译：二氧化碳捕集与封存技术（CCS）的实施被认为是一种重要的缓解气候变化的策略，但是该技术的可行性将取决于公众对CCS政策决策的接受程度。以学生为参与者的三个实验的结果表明，利益集团是否有机会在决策过程中表达意见（即集团声音），会影响CCS政策决策的接受程度，从而推断决策者的可信赖性这种效果。与无声程序相比，决策程序为不同的利益群体提供了平等机会表达意见，从而激发了对决策者的更多信任，进而导致他们更愿意接受决策（例如，单方面决策-研究1）。 ）和不平等的团体发声程序（即，当一种类型的兴趣组接收到语音，而另一种类型的兴趣组没有接收到学习2时）。研究3进一步表明，个人对CCS的了解程度降低了对普通民众在决策过程中表达意见，推断决策者的可信赖度和政策接受度的渴望。这些结果表明，即使人们没有直接亲自参与决策过程，他们也会在决策中关心自己的声音。我们得出的结论是，人们在决定接受或反对有关政治复杂问题的政策决定时倾向于使用程序性信息。因此，政策制定者必须使用公平的团体语音程序，并与公众沟通如何做出决定，这一点很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号