• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Affective and Deliberative Processes in Risky Choice: Age Differences in Risk Taking in the Columbia Card Task
【24h】

Affective and Deliberative Processes in Risky Choice: Age Differences in Risk Taking in the Columbia Card Task

机译：风险选择中的情感和协商过程：哥伦比亚卡任务中承担风险的年龄差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The authors investigated risk taking and underlying information use in 13- to 16- and 17- to 19-year-old adolescents and in adults in 4 experiments, using a novel dynamic risk-taking task, the Columbia Card Task (CCT). The authors investigated risk taking under differential involvement of affective versus deliberative processes with 2 versions of the CCT. constituting the most direct test of a dual-system explanation of adolescent risk taking in the literature so far. The "hot" CCT was designed to trigger more affective decision making, whereas the "cold" CCT was designed to trigger more deliberative decision making. Differential involvement of affective versus deliberative processes in the 2 CCT versions was established by self-reports and assessment of electrodermal activity. Increased adolescent risk taking, coupled with simplified information use, was found in the hot but not the cold condition. Need-for-arousal predicted risk taking only in the hot condition, whereas executive functions predicted information use in the cold condition. Results are consistent with recent dual-system explanations of risk taking its the result of competition between affective processes and deliberative cognitive-control processes, with adolescents' affective system tending to override the deliberative system in states of heightened emotional arousal.
机译：作者使用一种新颖的动态冒险任务哥伦比亚卡任务（CCT），在4个实验中调查了13至16岁和17至19至19岁的青少年以及成年人的冒险行为和基本信息使用。作者研究了使用两种版本的CCT在情感过程与审议过程的不同参与下进行冒险的情况。构成迄今为止文献中对青少年风险的双重系统解释的最直接检验。 “热” CCT旨在触发更多的情感决策，而“冷” CCT旨在触发更多的协商决策。通过自我报告和对皮肤电活动的评估，确定了2种CCT版本中情感过程与审议过程的区别参与。在炎热而不是寒冷的情况下，发现青少年风险承担增加，加上简化的信息使用。需求刺激仅在炎热的情况下预测冒险，而执行功能则预测在寒冷的条件下使用信息。结果与最近的双重系统解释相一致，这种解释以风险过程在情感过程和协商性认知控制过程之间的竞争为结果，在情绪唤起状态下，青少年的情感系统趋向于超越协商系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号