...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Separating bias and sensitivity in judgments of associative memory
【24h】

Separating bias and sensitivity in judgments of associative memory

机译：联想记忆判断中的偏见和敏感性分开

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ratings of the degree of association between words are linearly related to normed associative strengths, but the intercept is high, and the slope is shallow (the judgments of associative memory [JAM] function). Two experiments included manipulations intended to decrease the intercept and increase the slope. Discrimination training on many pairs of words and constraining ratings to sum to a constant both reduced the intercept but failed to change the slope. The intercept of the JAM function appears to contain a bias component that can be manipulated independently of the slope, which reflects sensitivity to associative strengths.
机译：单词之间的关联度等级与规范的关联强度呈线性关系，但截距较高，斜率较浅（关联记忆[JAM]函数的判断）。两个实验包括旨在减少截距和增加斜率的操作。对许多单词的辨别训练和将总和约束为一个常数的约束等级都减少了截距，但未能改变斜率。 JAM函数的截距似乎包含可以独立于斜率进行操纵的偏差分量，这反映了对关联强度的敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号