...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forest Planning >Classification of Project Approaches by the Construction of Participatory Framework and the Building of Farmers Capacity for Sustainable Management of Natural Resources: A Case Study in the Panama Canal Watershed
【24h】

Classification of Project Approaches by the Construction of Participatory Framework and the Building of Farmers Capacity for Sustainable Management of Natural Resources: A Case Study in the Panama Canal Watershed

机译：通过参与框架的建立和农民对自然资源可持续管理能力的建设来对项目方法进行分类：以巴拿马运河流域为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study aims to categorize the approaches of four projects which were analyzed and verified by two cut ends; 1) the Construction of Participatory Framework (CPF) to establish adequate rules and good organization, and 2) the Building of Farmers Capacity (BFC) to enhance farmers' capacity in technical and financial phases of their groups' activities. It was possible to classify the four project approaches utilizing results of semi-structured interview survey with key informants about the support strategies and the contents of support from projects to farmers groups in this study. It was confirmed that Triple C (the Sustainable Rural Development Project in the Provinces of Code, Colon and Panama), RSEN (The Selective Reforestation with Native Species), and PROCCAPA (the Panama Canal Watershed Conservation Project) were classified with the New Paradigm approach emphasizing people but MARENA (the Management of Natural Resources Project) was classified with the Old Paradigm approach which did not consider BFC. Triple C was classified as a Financial Emphasized Type, and RSEN and PROCCAPA were determined to be Technical Emphasized Types. According to the differences in the countermeasures for the lack of income generation to farmers, RSEN has been classified with Payment Approach and PROCCAPA has been classified Communication Approach. In the next study, this classification resulted through the scoring will be from the view point of farmers for verifying which approach promotes farmers participation more or which approach propels farmers' activities more effectively in order to contribute to the suitable design of future projects for sustainable management of natural resources.
机译：本研究旨在对四个项目的方法进行分类，并通过两个切入点进行了分析和验证。 1）构建参与框架以建立适当的规则和良好的组织，2）建立农民能力（BFC）以增强农民在其小组活动的技术和财务阶段的能力。利用半结构化访谈调查的结果与关键信息提供者，可以对四种项目方法进行分类，以了解本研究中支持策略以及项目对农民群体的支持内容。可以肯定的是，采用新范式方法对Triple C（Code，Colon和Panama省的可持续农村发展项目），RSEN（有原生种的选择性造林）和PROCCAPA（巴拿马运河流域保护项目）进行了分类。强调人，但MARENA（自然资源管理项目）采用的旧范式分类，没有考虑BFC。三重C被归类为财务重点类型，RSEN和PROCCAPA被确定为技术重点类型。根据农民缺乏创收对策的差异，对RSEN进行了支付方式分类，对PROCCAPA进行了交流方式分类。在下一个研究中，通过评分得出的分类将是从农民的角度出发，以验证哪种方法可以促进农民更多地参与或哪种方法可以更有效地推动农民的活动，从而为未来可持续管理项目的设计做出贡献自然资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号