• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health communication >Making sense of cancer news coverage trends: a comparison of three comprehensive content analyses.
【24h】

Making sense of cancer news coverage trends: a comparison of three comprehensive content analyses.

机译：弄清癌症新闻报道的趋势：三种综合内容分析的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Cancer stories (N = 5,327) in the top 50 U.S. newspapers were analyzed by a team of four coders and the results were compared with the earliest analyses of this type (from 1977 and 1980). Using cancer incidence rates as a comparison, three cancers were found to be consistently underreported (male reproductive, lymphatic/Hodgkin's, and thyroid) and four cancers were found to be consistently overreported (breast, blood/Leukemia, pancreatic, and bone/muscle). In addition, cancer news coverage consistently has focused on treatment rather than on other aspects of the cancer continuum (e.g., prevention), portrayed lifestyle choices (e.g., diet, smoking) as the most common cancer risk factor, and rarely reported incidence or mortality data. Finally, the data were compatible with the idea that personalization bias (e.g., celebrity profiles, event coverage) may explain some news coverage distortions.
机译：由四个编码员组成的小组分析了美国排名前50位的报纸上的癌症故事（N = 5327），并将结果与​​此类最早的分析（自1977年和1980年）进行了比较。使用癌症发生率进行比较，发现三种癌症的报告率始终较低（男性生殖，淋巴/霍奇金和甲状腺），而四种癌症的报告率始终较高（乳腺癌，血液/白血病，胰腺癌和骨骼/肌肉） 。此外，癌症新闻报道始终集中于治疗，而不是癌症连续体的其他方面（例如预防），刻画的生活方式选择（例如饮食，吸烟）是最常见的癌症风险因素，很少报道发病率或死亡率数据。最后，这些数据与个性化偏见（例如名人资料，事件报道）可以解释某些新闻报道失真的想法兼容。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号