首页> 外文期刊>Journal of international development: The journal of the development studies association >CONDUCTING HEALTH-RELATED SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH IN LOW INCOME SETTINGS: ETHICAL DILEMMAS FACED IN KENYA AND SOUTH AFRICA
【24h】

CONDUCTING HEALTH-RELATED SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH IN LOW INCOME SETTINGS: ETHICAL DILEMMAS FACED IN KENYA AND SOUTH AFRICA

机译:在低收入人群中开展与健康有关的社会科学研究:肯尼亚和南非面临的伦理困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The value of the social sciences is increasingly recognised in health services and clinical research, contributing to an increasing number of multi-disciplinary, multi-method studies. Such studies offer numerous advantages, but also pose particular challenges, including different approaches to or foci in research ethics across disciplines. Drawing on two similar studies conducted in coastal Kenya and in rural South Africa, we share the ethical challenges we faced in relation to several key principles, the responses we adopted, and the new dilemmas that resulted from our actions. Given that multi-disciplinary, multi-method studies are often reviewed by committees with greater familiarity with biomedical than social science research, we conclude by drawing on our experiences, and the wider literature and guidelines around conducting social science research, to make suggestions of additional considerations for social science elements of multi-disciplinary research. We also emphasise that in practice it is the social relationships that are established between researchers and field-teams, and between field-teams and community members, that are critical to fulfilling the moral (as opposed to the legal) aspects of ethics guidelines. These essential elements of ethical practice, and of producing quality data, are not easily tested and checked by ethics committees. Rather they are linked to the insight and integrity of the principle investigators and their research teams.
机译:社会科学的价值在卫生服务和临床研究中得到越来越多的认可,为越来越多的多学科,多方法研究做出了贡献。这样的研究具有许多优势,但也带来了特殊的挑战,包括跨学科研究伦理学的不同方法或重点。借鉴在肯尼亚沿海和南非农村进行的两项类似研究,我们分享了在几个关键原则,我们采取的应对措施以及我们的行动带来的新困境方面面临的道德挑战。鉴于多学科,多方法的研究通常会由对生物医学比对社会科学研究更熟悉的委员会进行审查,因此我们总结总结我们的经验以及围绕进行社会科学研究的更广泛的文献和指南,以提出更多建议多学科研究的社会科学要素的考虑。我们还强调,在实践中,对于研究人员与实地团队之间以及实地团队与社区成员之间建立的社会关系,对于实现道德规范的道德(相对于法律)方面至关重要。道德委员会不容易测试和检查道德实践和产生质量数据的这些基本要素。相反,它们与主要调查人员及其研究团队的洞察力和完整性联系在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号