...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Mathematical Economics >Welfare comparisons of income distributions and family size: An individualistic approach
【24h】

Welfare comparisons of income distributions and family size: An individualistic approach

机译：收入分配和家庭规模的福利比较：个人主义方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

We investigate the problem of how to perform comparisons of income distributions across families of different sizes. We argue that social welfare ought to be computed as the average individual utility instead of the average household utility as in most known criteria. We provide dominance criteria which allow for some indeterminacy about the average optimal family size, by resorting to the bounded approach to dominance analysis proposed by Fleurbaey et al. (2003). Indeed, when differences in needs come from family size, a specific population allocation problem (how a population should be optimally divided over families for given resources) adds to the usual income allocation problem. Pro-family and anti-family stances are introduced in order to make explicit the choice of an optimal family size. An application to French data shows that shifting from the household to the individualistic point of view can substantially alter the outlook of dominance results.
机译：我们研究了如何对不同规模的家庭之间的收入分配进行比较的问题。我们认为，应该将社会福利计算为平均个人效用，而不是大多数已知标准中的平均家庭效用。通过采用Fleurbaey等人提出的有界方法进行优势度分析，我们提供了优势标准，该准则允许对平均最佳家庭规模存在不确定性。 （2003）。确实，当需求差异来自家庭规模时，特定的人口分配问题（如何在给定的资源下将人口最佳地分配给家庭）会增加通常的收入分配问题。引入亲家庭和反家庭立场，以便明确选择最佳家庭规模。一项对法国数据的应用表明，从家庭观念向个人主义观念的转变可以大大改变主导地位的前景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号