首页> 外文期刊>Journal of optics, A. Pure and applied optics: journal of the European Optical Society >Analyses of the performances of 10 Gb s~~(-1) time-division multiplexing and wavelength-division multiplexing signals in single-mode fibers and non-zero dispersion-shifted fibers
【24h】

Analyses of the performances of 10 Gb s~~(-1) time-division multiplexing and wavelength-division multiplexing signals in single-mode fibers and non-zero dispersion-shifted fibers

机译:单模光纤和非零色散位移光纤中10 Gb s ~~(-1)时分复用和波分复用信号的性能分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performances of dense 10 Gb s~(-1) time-division multiplexing (TDM) and wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) signals (Δλ = 0.2 nm) are analyzed comparatively for transmission in single-mode fibers (SMFs) and in non-zero dispersion-shifted fibers (NZDSFs). In the ultrahigh capacity and ultralong haul communications, the TDM format is superior to WDM when dispersion is precisely compensated (including third-order dispersion compensation). As far as the dispersion compensation is concerned, fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) are more advantageous than dispersion compensation fibers (DCFs) in SMFs. But in NZDSFs, when the distance is shorter than 2000 km, the difference between adopting FBGs and DCFs is not distinct, and with the distance further increasing, DCFs retain their superiority even though the group dispersion ripples of FBGs are ignored.
机译:比较分析了密集10 Gb s〜(-1)时分多路复用(TDM)和波分多路复用(WDM)信号(Δλ= 0.2 nm)在单模光纤(SMF)和非单模光纤中的传输性能。 -零色散位移光纤(NZDSF)。在超大容量和超长距离通信中,当色散得到精确补偿(包括三阶色散补偿)时,TDM格式优于WDM。就色散补偿而言,光纤布拉格光栅(FBG)比SMF中的色散补偿光纤(DCF)更有利。但是在NZDSF中,当距离小于2000 km时,采用FBG和DCF之间的区别并不明显,并且随着距离的进一步增加,即使忽略了FBG的组色散波纹,DCF仍保持其优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号